Practice
Area

Media

McKinney Mediation

McKinney Mediation

The use of mediation as a conflict resolution mechanism has been increasing among McKinney residents, as well as throughout Collin County and Dallas County. Many of the parties now turning to mediation are using it to help negotiate divorce settlements. For many divorce proceedings, both contested and amicable, mediation has time and again proven to be an appropriate, and beneficial option. Please read below for a brief overview of mediation—its mechanics, benefits, and limits.

Mediation Basics

Mediation is a form of alternative dispute resolution (ADR). Understanding that not all parties need, or prefer, to resolve their disputes through traditional litigation avenues, the Texas Legislature now permits parties in dispute to use alternative means to resolve conflicts. The mechanics of mediation (like the other forms of ADR such as, arbitration are governed by the Texas Family Code. In the traditional courtroom litigation process, disputing parties present their arguments in a public court overseen by a judge. Mediation, and ADR generally, is different from that traditional litigation route in a few key ways. First, it lets couples who seek a resolution to their dispute in a private setting, away from public eyes. For many couples in McKinney, this means that they can cut a large portion of the legal work out their divorce cases. Additionally, this ADR form is popular because it provides divorcing couples with a specially trained, impartial third party (the mediator). In the Dallas Fort Worth area, mediation proceedings occur in neutral settings, such as a lawyer’s office, or a neutral conference room. However, due to the increased flexibility of mediation proceedings, no particular setting is required, and the use of remote mediation is also available in a growing number of circumstances.  

Many couples find that this increased flexibility enables mediation to be a cheaper, less stressful, and more efficient option than traditional litigation. Additionally, in mediation, it is the parties themselves that craft the resolution. In fact, many couples refer to this “driver’s seat” mentality, as a predominant reason for preferring this ADR method over traditional litigation, where all matters of the case are decided by the court with little input from the parties themselves.

Typically, mediation sessions can last up to a full day. At first glance, this may seem like a daunting timeline, but this a single day of negotiations is significantly shorter than traditional litigation, where the parties are routinely required to wait several hours even for relatively minor hearings. If, at the expiration of the allotted mediation time, the couple is unable to arrive at a mutually-agreeable solution, the parties will be left to make a decision between three options: (1) if a solution is close at hand with only a few minor details to be resolved, the parties can request the mediator for a brief extension; (2) if a solution seems likely, but not imminent, they may request the mediator schedule an additional mediation session; or (3) if a mediated solution does not appear to be within reach, the parties can simply call for the cessation of negotiations, and begin preparations for a different approach. Of course, whether a case can be resolved within the scheduled amount of time will depend on the number of contested issues between the parties and their relevant positions on those issues. 

Who is the Mediator?

Mediators are always neutral, third-party individual. This means that the any person who may have an interested relationship (professional or otherwise) with one of the parties is barred from participating as the mediator. The mediator’s impartiality ensures that no undue influence will pollute the mediator’s efforts to guide the parties to an agreed solution. DFW area mediators are renowned for their command of various negotiation techniques and conflict resolution training. The mediator’s role is to help the parties arrive at their own solution by keeping the parties on track and drawing attention to the strengths and weaknesses in both parties’s positions. And while most mediators are licensed attorneys, they are prohibited from offering legal advice to either parties during the course of the mediation process.

Unlike traditional litigation, in which a judge issues a final decision, mediators have no legal authority to compel the parties into agreement. This means that the mediator cannot force either party to accept any term that he or she will not accept. Rather, mediator’s role more akin to a guide who helps the parties through the mediation process and, ultimately, to an amicable resolution. 

Mediation Benefits

As was mentioned above, many North Texas couples find mediation to be a great choice. Such couples have benefited from mediation in the following ways:

  • Faster. Traditional divorce litigation is often a long process. Courtroom procedure added to a crowded court docket have a tendency to draw out litigation timelines to over 18 months. Mediation, by contrast, permits the parties to arrange mediation sessions according to their schedules, without the need to find an available spot in the court’s docket. 
  • Cheaper. Reduced time often translates to reduced costs. This mantra holds true with mediation. By reducing the time necessary to find a resolution, mediation has the ability to significantly reduce costs for the great majority of couples. The ability to sidestep some of the most time-consuming aspects traditional courtroom procedure, such as hearings, discovery and depositions, greatly reduces the time necessary to arrive at a solution. For many couples, the time savings alone are reason enough to prefer this ADR method over traditional litigation. 
  • More Flexible. Largely unshackled from the constraints of the courtroom, mediation endows couples with significantly more control and permits a level of flexibility unavailable in traditional litigation. 
  • Greater Chance of Success. When the parties feel like they are able to have a real impact on the resolution of their case, they are more likely to play an active role in its resolution. This greater sense of control often results in a greater likelihood of a mediated solution. Similarly, couples who report amicable resolutions to their disputes are more likely to exhibit increased levels of satisfaction overall.

After Mediation

Once the parties have arrived at an agreement, their lawyers will compile all of the agreement’s key terms and provisions into a written term sheet. This document is called the Mediated Settlement Agreement (MSA). Both parties will have the opportunity to review the MSA after it has been drafted, but before the conclusion of the mediation session(s). Assuming the MSA mirrors the parties’ agreement, it will be signed by the parties, their attorneys, and also the mediator. After signing, the parties’ lawyers will draft a Final Decree of Divorce. Again, the parties will have the opportunity to review the Final Decree so that its accurately reflects the MSA. After the final draft has been approved by both parties, the FinalDecree will be presented to and signed by the Judge. At that time, the agreement will have the force of law behind it.

When Mediation Does Not Solve Every Issue

Even amicable divorce cases, couples likely will not agree on every aspect of their split. This is normal and does not present an insurmountable issue for mediation. When a couple is unable to agree on a specific term or issue, then they can continue with the mediation for all other terms, but revert to another ADR method or even traditional litigation for the remaining, unresolved issues. Because of this win-win aspect of mediation, it is almost always beneficial for couples to at least make a good faith attempt at mediation before resorting to alternative approaches. 

Contact a McKinney Mediation Attorney for Help Today

If you would like to discussion mediation with an experienced lawyer, contact our offices at (512) 746-7399 to speak with one of our McKinney mediation lawyers and learn whether mediation may be an appropriate avenue for your matter.

Request Consultation

    Empowering Clients.

    Achieving Results. ®

    TESTIMONIALS

    • "The divorce process is not an easy one, but I always felt fully supported, informed, and guided by Chris and the staff. Chris always laid out the options, made me aware of the risks, and provided me with recommendations, but he also gave me the flexibility to work out things with my ex where I could, to speed up the process and avoid some legal expenses. I highly recommend Chris for family law representation. ”

      David - Divorce Representation

    • "I’m a lawyer myself and Holly helped me with my recent divorce. She did an amazing job. She covered all the little issues that would have collectively cost me a bunch of money in the long run if she had not been so detail-oriented and focused. She is a tenacious advocate for her clients who aims to resolve matters amicably but will fight tooth-and-nail for her clients if that is what it takes to reach a...”

      Anonymous - Holly is the lawyer who lawyers hire for their own divorces

    • "Chris handled my case professionally, efficiently, and demonstrated a very strong knowledge of family law. Chris took the time to learn and understand all aspects of my situation and used that knowledge to develop a focused strategy that led to a successful outcome. I highly recommend Chris. ”

      Martin - Excellent Lawyer

    • "Ashley Morgan and her paralegal Aleks were both so amazing to work with. They were second to none in responsiveness and work ethic. I would recommend her work to anyone looking for family law, and could not be happier with my decision to work with them. Just a great group of people who are knowledgeable and passionate about the work they do. ”

      Josh Campbell - Family Law

    • "This was as good an experience as you can possibly have with a divorce situation! Candice and Laurie were professional yet compassionate. They treated me with great respect and were always available to answer my questions. The best part is they always had my best interest at heart. I would highly recommend Kirker Davis and Candice Derelye and Laurie Theriot. They are the best! ”

      Susan Morris - A divorce situation

    • "This was my first time ever working with lawyers and words cannot express how grateful I am for Ashley Morgan and her team. I needed direction during a difficult time and she provided step by step service. Would highly recommend! ”

      Erik Jurado - Highly recommended

    • "I praise Attorney Alyse Donnelly for all the hard work and hours she put in my divorce case. I believe that her experience, knowledge, and quick thinking resulted in beneficial results on my behalf. Ms. Donnelly along with Paralegal Stacy O’Brien and Attorney Michelle Fontenot are definitely assets to the Kirker Davis law firm. ”

      Bertha Solis - My divorce case

    • "My experience with Kirker Davis has been amazing. Candice Deyerle has been my attorney and in just under a month she helped to correct severe deficiencies in my custody case. She and her team respond within minutes or hours to even the most mundane requests. From the moment I walked in the office, I was greeted with an exceptional level of service, and even the receptionist inspires class and confidence. I wh...”

      Daniel Kearns - Custody case

    • "From my first visit, I felt like Candice listened to every word I said and showed concern about my pending situation. My ongoing experiences throughout our working together, made me feel like they were genuinely concerned about me and my integrity. If I wandered off course, Candice would guide me back online! Fantastic results! ”

      Edward Novess - Fantastic results

    Austin Family Attorneys

    Is Divorce Imminent

    Download “The 4 Steps In Every Divorce” eBook so you can be better prepared

    Download Now

    Austin Family Attorneys

    Request Consultation

    A strategic step towards resolution

    Submit a Request
    • Austin Office